'Because things don’t appear to be the known thing; they aren’t what they seemed to be neither will they become what they might appear to become.'
Posted by Tessa den Uyl and Martin Cohen
Picture credit: Harry Rutter
Words, by repeating their connotation, their application
seems to follow rather rigid schemes, hence we might even think that, after all,
words work. Authority depends on making words effective. Don’t move! Stop! Words that are not only verbal but follow a series of physical gestures as well, that we should understand, not question.
Now let us enter this door in the picture above.
After all, there is written welcome. If there would be a person behind that
door we would be told we are not allowed to be there. “Have you not read there
is written No Entry?” Well no, we focused on the welcome, and would a welcome
not be open to all?
This is not how it works, and we do understand
this. Even when the combination of more words clearly carries along a form of
incongruous meanings, most often the no rejects the yes.
Being human is to be ambivalent by nature. We
cannot avoid contradictions within our own selves, a plural reading of meaning, of
relations. But somehow we have learned that property is connected to
prohibition. Exclusion is our logic. Hence this is why, in our
language, a welcome can be offered to some but not
to all?
